Colombia vs Latvia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Colombia
0.9%
in 2022
Latvia
0.9%
in 2022
Colombia rank
71st
Latvia rank
74th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Colombia
- Latvia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Latvia ahead.
Colombia ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 4.9% | 4.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Colombia or Latvia?
- Colombia, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Colombia and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and Latvia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Colombia ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.