Congo vs Côte d'Ivoire: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Côte d'Ivoire
3.4%
in 2022
Congo rank
15th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
13th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 3.4% against 3.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 15th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 13th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Côte d'Ivoire in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.6% | 2.4% | 2.2% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 3.0% | 0.7% | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Congo or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 3.4% against 3.2% in Congo as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0.2%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 15th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 13th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.