Congo vs Peru: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Peru
2.5%
in 2022
Congo rank
15th
Peru rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Peru
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.2% against 2.5% in Peru, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 15th and Peru ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.6% | 1.4% | 3.2% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 2.4% | 0.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Congo or Peru?
- Congo, at 3.2% against 2.5% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Congo and Peru?
- 0.7%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Peru rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 15th and Peru ranks 18th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.