Congo vs Suriname: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Suriname
3.3%
in 2022
Congo rank
15th
Suriname rank
14th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 3.3% against 3.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Suriname ahead.
Congo ranks 15th and Suriname ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.6% | 4.1% | 0.5% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 5.1% | 2.8% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Congo or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 3.3% against 3.2% in Congo as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Congo and Suriname?
- 0.1%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 15th and Suriname ranks 14th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.