Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.4%
in 2022
Congo rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.2% against 0.4% in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Congo's figure about 8.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 174 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.6% | 0.2% | 4.4% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 0.2% | 2.1% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Congo, at 3.2% against 0.4% in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 2.8%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.