Congo vs Uruguay: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Congo
3.2%
in 2022
Uruguay
3.5%
in 2022
Congo rank
15th
Uruguay rank
12th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Congo
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 3.5% against 3.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Uruguay ahead.
Congo ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 188 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.6% | 4.7% | 0.1% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 2.8% | 0.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Congo or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 3.5% against 3.2% in Congo as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Congo and Uruguay?
- 0.3%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Congo ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.