Costa Rica vs Latvia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Costa Rica
0.8%
in 2022
Latvia
0.9%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
70th
Latvia rank
68th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Costa Rica
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 70th and Latvia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2% | 4.9% | 4.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 1.8% | 1.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Costa Rica or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Costa Rica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Latvia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Costa Rica ranks 70th and Latvia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.