Cote d'Ivoire vs Suriname: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Cote d'Ivoire
3.4%
in 2022
Suriname
3.3%
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire rank
13th
Suriname rank
15th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Suriname
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 3.4% against 3.3% in Suriname, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Suriname ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 15th of 204 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.4% | 4.1% | 1.7% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 5.1% | 2.1% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Cote d'Ivoire or Suriname?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 3.4% against 3.3% in Suriname as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Cote d'Ivoire and Suriname?
- 0.1%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Suriname rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 15th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.