Cote d'Ivoire vs Uruguay: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Cote d'Ivoire
3.4%
in 2022
Uruguay
3.5%
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire rank
13th
Uruguay rank
12th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 3.5% against 3.4% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Uruguay ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 204 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.4% | 4.7% | 2.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 2.8% | 0.2% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Cote d'Ivoire or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 3.5% against 3.4% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay?
- 0.1%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.