Curaçao vs Latvia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Curaçao
0.9%
in 2022
Latvia
0.9%
in 2022
Curaçao rank
73rd
Latvia rank
74th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Curaçao
- Latvia
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Latvia ahead.
Curaçao ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 4.9% | 4.1% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Curaçao or Latvia?
- Curaçao, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Curaçao and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Curaçao and Latvia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Curaçao ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.