Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

Democratic Republic of the Congo
1.7%
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea
7.7%
in 2022
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th
Equatorial Guinea rank
2nd

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
2468201820202022

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7.7% against 1.7% in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 6.0%.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 4.6 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd of 18 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 4.4% 6.1% 1.7% Equatorial Guinea
2020s 2.8% 8.2% 5.4% Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 7.7% against 1.7% in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
6.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/equatorial-guinea/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
222 places, 1,110 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed