Dominican Republic vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

Dominican Republic
0.4%
in 2022
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
0.4%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
116th
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
117th

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands
00.250.50.751201820202022

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Heard Island and McDonald Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Heard Island and McDonald Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 116th and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 117th of 202 countries.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Heard Island and McDonald Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4% 0.8% 0.4% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2020s 0.2% 0.8% 0.6% Heard Island and McDonald Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Dominican Republic or Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
Dominican Republic, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Heard Island and McDonald Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Dominican Republic and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
0.0%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Dominican Republic and Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
Dominican Republic ranks 116th and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 117th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/dominican-republic/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/dominican-republic/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/">Dominican Republic vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 1,170 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed