Eastern Asia vs Faroe Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Eastern Asia
0.8%
in 2022
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Eastern Asia rank
20th
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Eastern Asia
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 0.8% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 2.9 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 20th and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 30 groups.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 2.0% | 1.6% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 2.5% | 2.2% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Eastern Asia or Faroe Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 0.8% in Eastern Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Eastern Asia and Faroe Islands?
- 1.6%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Faroe Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Eastern Asia and Faroe Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Eastern Asia ranks 20th and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.