Eastern Asia vs Iceland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Eastern Asia
0.8%
in 2022
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Eastern Asia rank
21st
Iceland rank
23rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Eastern Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.3% against 0.8% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.8 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 21st and Iceland ranks 23rd of 43 regions.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 1.8% | 1.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Eastern Asia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2.3% against 0.8% in Eastern Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Eastern Asia and Iceland?
- 1.5%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Eastern Asia and Iceland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Eastern Asia ranks 21st and Iceland ranks 23rd of 43 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.