Ecuador vs Eritrea: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Ecuador
1.3%
in 2022
Eritrea
1.3%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
53rd
Eritrea rank
55th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Ecuador
- Eritrea
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.3% against 1.3% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Eritrea ahead.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Eritrea ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.6% | 1.0% | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Ecuador or Eritrea?
- Ecuador, at 1.3% against 1.3% in Eritrea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Eritrea ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.