Ecuador vs Namibia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Ecuador
1.3%
in 2022
Namibia
1.4%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
53rd
Namibia rank
50th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1.4% against 1.3% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6% | 2.3% | 1.7% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 2.0% | 1.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 1.4% against 1.3% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 50th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.