El Salvador vs Finland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
El Salvador
2.2%
in 2022
Finland
2.2%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
28th
Finland rank
29th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- El Salvador
- Finland
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Finland ahead.
El Salvador ranks 28th and Finland ranks 29th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 6.3% | 5.2% | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.2% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, El Salvador or Finland?
- El Salvador, at 2.2% against 2.2% in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between El Salvador and Finland?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Finland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- El Salvador ranks 28th and Finland ranks 29th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.