El Salvador vs Northern Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
El Salvador
2.2%
in 2022
Northern Africa
0.4%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
28th
Northern Africa rank
26th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- El Salvador
- Northern Africa
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 5.9 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 28th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 0.5% | 1.4% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, El Salvador or Northern Africa?
- El Salvador, at 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between El Salvador and Northern Africa?
- 1.8%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Northern Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Northern Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- El Salvador ranks 28th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.