El Salvador vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
El Salvador
2.2%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
28th
Norway rank
27th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- El Salvador
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
El Salvador ranks 28th and Norway ranks 27th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 5.2% | 4.1% | Norway |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 0.9% | 1.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, El Salvador or Norway?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 2.2% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between El Salvador and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- El Salvador ranks 28th and Norway ranks 27th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.