El Salvador vs Oceania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
El Salvador
2.2%
in 2022
Oceania
0.3%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
28th
Oceania rank
27th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- El Salvador
- Oceania
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 2.2% against 0.3% in Oceania, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 6.2 times Oceania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 27th of 174 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.7% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 0.4% | 1.6% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, El Salvador or Oceania?
- El Salvador, at 2.2% against 0.3% in Oceania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between El Salvador and Oceania?
- 1.9%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Oceania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- El Salvador ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 27th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.