Equatorial Guinea vs Northern Europe: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Equatorial Guinea
7.7%
in 2022
Northern Europe
1.8%
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
2nd
Northern Europe rank
4th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7.7% against 1.8% in Northern Europe, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 4.2 times Northern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Northern Europe ranks 4th of 174 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.1% | 4.9% | 1.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 1.7% | 6.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Equatorial Guinea or Northern Europe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 7.7% against 1.8% in Northern Europe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Equatorial Guinea and Northern Europe?
- 5.9%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Northern Europe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Northern Europe rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Northern Europe ranks 4th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.