Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Equatorial Guinea
7.7%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
5.0%
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
2nd
Sri Lanka rank
5th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7.7% against 5.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 5th of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.1% | 1.6% | 4.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 3.4% | 4.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 7.7% against 5.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 2.7%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 5th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.