Estonia vs Faroe Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Estonia
2.4%
in 2022
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Estonia rank
22nd
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Estonia
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 2.4% in Estonia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 22nd and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.6% | 2.0% | 3.7% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 2.2% | 2.5% | 0.4% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Estonia or Faroe Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 2.4% in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Estonia and Faroe Islands?
- 0.0%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Faroe Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Estonia and Faroe Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Estonia ranks 22nd and Faroe Islands ranks 21st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.