Europe and Northern America vs Greenland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Europe and Northern America
1.8%
in 2022
Greenland
3.8%
in 2022
Europe and Northern America rank
6th
Greenland rank
9th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Europe and Northern America
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 3.8% against 1.8% in Europe and Northern America, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 2.1 times Europe and Northern America's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Greenland ahead.
Europe and Northern America ranks 6th and Greenland ranks 9th of 32 groups.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe and Northern America | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.2% | 3.5% | 0.3% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 3.0% | 0.9% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Europe and Northern America or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 3.8% against 1.8% in Europe and Northern America as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Europe and Northern America and Greenland?
- 2.0%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Northern America and Greenland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Europe and Northern America and Greenland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Europe and Northern America ranks 6th and Greenland ranks 9th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.