Faroe Islands vs Guatemala: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Guatemala
2.5%
in 2022
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Guatemala rank
19th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Faroe Islands
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2.5% against 2.4% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 19th of 168 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 1.5% | 1.0% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Faroe Islands or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 2.5% against 2.4% in Faroe Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Faroe Islands and Guatemala?
- 0.1%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Guatemala?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Faroe Islands and Guatemala rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 19th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.