Faroe Islands vs Iceland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Iceland rank
23rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Faroe Islands
- Iceland
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 2.3% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Iceland ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Iceland ranks 23rd of 168 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.0% | 1.8% | 0.2% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 1.7% | 0.9% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Faroe Islands or Iceland?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 2.3% in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Faroe Islands and Iceland?
- 0.1%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Faroe Islands and Iceland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Iceland ranks 23rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.