Faroe Islands vs Russian Federation: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Russian Federation
2.4%
in 2022
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Russian Federation rank
20th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Faroe Islands
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 2.4% against 2.4% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.0% | 3.5% | 1.5% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.0% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Faroe Islands or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 2.4% against 2.4% in Faroe Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Faroe Islands and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Faroe Islands and Russian Federation rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.