Faroe Islands vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Wallis and Futuna Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Wallis and Futuna Islands rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Faroe Islands
- Wallis and Futuna Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 172.5 times Wallis and Futuna Islands's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.
Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Wallis and Futuna Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 0.1% | 2.5% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Faroe Islands or Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Faroe Islands and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 2.4%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Faroe Islands and Wallis and Futuna Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.