Faroe Islands vs Western Europe: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Faroe Islands
2.4%
in 2022
Western Europe
0.8%
in 2022
Faroe Islands rank
21st
Western Europe rank
21st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Faroe Islands
- Western Europe
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 2.4% against 0.8% in Western Europe, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 3.1 times Western Europe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.
Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Western Europe ranks 21st of 174 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Western Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 1.0% | 1.6% | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Faroe Islands or Western Europe?
- Faroe Islands, at 2.4% against 0.8% in Western Europe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Faroe Islands and Western Europe?
- 1.6%, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Western Europe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Faroe Islands and Western Europe rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Faroe Islands ranks 21st and Western Europe ranks 21st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.