Finland vs Ghana: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Finland
2.2%
in 2022
Ghana
2.0%
in 2022
Finland rank
30th
Ghana rank
33rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Finland
- Ghana
How they compare
Finland currently reports 2.2% against 2.0% in Ghana, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.3% | 1.8% | 4.5% | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 2.7% | 0.9% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Finland or Ghana?
- Finland, at 2.2% against 2.0% in Ghana as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Finland and Ghana?
- 0.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Ghana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Ghana rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Finland ranks 30th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.