Finland vs Northern Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Finland
2.2%
in 2022
Northern Africa
0.4%
in 2022
Finland rank
29th
Northern Africa rank
26th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Finland
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Finland currently reports 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Finland's figure about 5.9 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 29th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.3% | 0.7% | 5.6% | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.5% | 1.3% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Finland or Northern Africa?
- Finland, at 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Finland and Northern Africa?
- 1.8%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Northern Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Northern Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Finland ranks 29th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.