Finland vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Finland
2.2%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Finland rank
30th
Norway rank
28th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Finland
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 2.2% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.3% | 5.2% | 1.0% | Finland |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Finland or Norway?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 2.2% in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Finland and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Finland ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.