Ghana vs Sweden: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Ghana
2.0%
in 2022
Sweden
1.8%
in 2022
Ghana rank
33rd
Sweden rank
35th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Ghana
- Sweden
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 2.0% against 1.8% in Sweden, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sweden ahead.
Ghana ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8% | 7.1% | 5.3% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 2.7% | 2.2% | 0.5% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Ghana or Sweden?
- Ghana, at 2.0% against 1.8% in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Ghana and Sweden?
- 0.2%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Ghana and Sweden rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Ghana ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.