Greenland vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Greenland
3.8%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.7%
in 2022
Greenland rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Greenland
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 3.8% against 1.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 2.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 174 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.5% | 2.7% | 0.9% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 3.0% | 2.0% | 1.1% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Greenland or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Greenland, at 3.8% against 1.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Greenland and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 2.1%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Greenland and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Greenland ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.