Guatemala vs Southern Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Guatemala
2.5%
in 2022
Southern Africa
1.1%
in 2022
Guatemala rank
19th
Southern Africa rank
17th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Guatemala
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2.5% against 1.1% in Southern Africa, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 2.2 times Southern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Guatemala ranks 19th and Southern Africa ranks 17th of 174 countries.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.8% | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Guatemala or Southern Africa?
- Guatemala, at 2.5% against 1.1% in Southern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Guatemala and Southern Africa?
- 1.4%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Southern Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Southern Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Guatemala ranks 19th and Southern Africa ranks 17th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.