Guatemala vs Wallis and Futuna Islands: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Guatemala
2.5%
in 2022
Wallis and Futuna Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Guatemala rank
19th
Wallis and Futuna Islands rank
18th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Guatemala
- Wallis and Futuna Islands
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2.5% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 175.6 times Wallis and Futuna Islands's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 19th and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Wallis and Futuna Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 0.1% | 1.5% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Guatemala or Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- Guatemala, at 2.5% against 0.0% in Wallis and Futuna Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Guatemala and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 2.5%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Wallis and Futuna Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Wallis and Futuna Islands rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Guatemala ranks 19th and Wallis and Futuna Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.