Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Israel: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
0.4%
in 2022
Israel
0.4%
in 2022
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
99th
Israel rank
101st
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands
- Israel
How they compare
Heard Island and McDonald Islands currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Israel, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 99th and Israel ranks 101st of 174 countries.
Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heard Island and McDonald Islands | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.5% | Heard Island and McDonald Islands |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Heard Island and McDonald Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Heard Island and McDonald Islands or Israel?
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Israel as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Israel?
- 0.0%, with Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Israel rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 99th and Israel ranks 101st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.