Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Romania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
0.4%
in 2022
Romania
0.4%
in 2022
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
99th
Romania rank
102nd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands
- Romania
How they compare
Heard Island and McDonald Islands currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Romania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 99th and Romania ranks 102nd of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Heard Island and McDonald Islands averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heard Island and McDonald Islands | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.2% | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.2% | Heard Island and McDonald Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Heard Island and McDonald Islands or Romania?
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Romania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Romania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 99th and Romania ranks 102nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.