Honduras vs Latvia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Honduras
0.9%
in 2022
Latvia
0.9%
in 2022
Honduras rank
75th
Latvia rank
74th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Honduras
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Honduras, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 4.9% | 4.9% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 1.8% | 1.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Honduras or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Honduras as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Honduras and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Honduras and Latvia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Honduras ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.