Iceland vs Jordan: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Jordan
2.3%
in 2022
Iceland rank
24th
Jordan rank
27th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Jordan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.3% against 2.3% in Jordan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 24th and Jordan ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8% | 1.1% | 0.7% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Iceland or Jordan?
- Iceland, at 2.3% against 2.3% in Jordan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Iceland and Jordan?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Jordan rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 24th and Jordan ranks 27th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.