Iceland vs Northern Africa and Western Asia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Northern Africa and Western Asia
0.8%
in 2022
Iceland rank
26th
Northern Africa and Western Asia rank
24th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Northern Africa and Western Asia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.3% against 0.8% in Northern Africa and Western Asia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 3.1 times Northern Africa and Western Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 26th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 24th of 202 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Northern Africa and Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.8% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.8% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Iceland or Northern Africa and Western Asia?
- Iceland, at 2.3% against 0.8% in Northern Africa and Western Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Iceland and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
- 1.5%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Northern Africa and Western Asia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Northern Africa and Western Asia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 26th and Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 24th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.