Iceland vs Oceania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Iceland
2.3%
in 2022
Oceania
0.3%
in 2022
Iceland rank
26th
Oceania rank
29th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Iceland
- Oceania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.3% against 0.3% in Oceania, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 6.7 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 26th and Oceania ranks 29th of 204 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8% | 0.3% | 1.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 0.4% | 1.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Iceland or Oceania?
- Iceland, at 2.3% against 0.3% in Oceania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Iceland and Oceania?
- 2.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Iceland and Oceania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Iceland ranks 26th and Oceania ranks 29th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.