Ireland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Ireland
1.6%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
1.8%
in 2022
Ireland rank
37th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
34th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Ireland
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1.8% against 1.6% in Ireland, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 174 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 3.7% | 2.6% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 4.4% | 2.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Ireland or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 1.8% against 1.6% in Ireland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Ireland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Ireland ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.