Jordan vs Northern Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Jordan
2.3%
in 2022
Northern Africa
0.4%
in 2022
Jordan rank
26th
Northern Africa rank
26th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Jordan
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2.3% against 0.4% in Northern Africa, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 6.2 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 26th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.4% | Jordan |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.8% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Jordan or Northern Africa?
- Jordan, at 2.3% against 0.4% in Northern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Jordan and Northern Africa?
- 1.9%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Northern Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Jordan and Northern Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Jordan ranks 26th and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.