Jordan vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Jordan
2.3%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Jordan rank
27th
Norway rank
28th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Jordan
- Norway
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2.3% against 2.2% in Norway, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
Jordan ranks 27th and Norway ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 5.2% | 4.2% | Norway |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.3% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Jordan or Norway?
- Jordan, at 2.3% against 2.2% in Norway as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Jordan and Norway?
- 0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Jordan and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Jordan ranks 27th and Norway ranks 28th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.