Maldives vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Maldives
0.3%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
0.4%
in 2022
Maldives rank
128th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
127th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Maldives
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.4% against 0.3% in Maldives, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Maldives ranks 128th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 127th of 202 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Maldives or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.4% against 0.3% in Maldives as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Maldives and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.1%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Maldives and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Maldives ranks 128th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 127th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.