Malta vs Saint Barthélemy: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Malta
0.1%
in 2022
Saint Barthélemy
0.1%
in 2022
Malta rank
147th
Saint Barthélemy rank
148th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Malta
- Saint Barthélemy
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Saint Barthélemy, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Saint Barthélemy's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 147th and Saint Barthélemy ranks 148th of 188 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Saint Barthélemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Malta or Saint Barthélemy?
- Malta, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Saint Barthélemy as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Malta and Saint Barthélemy?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Barthélemy?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Malta and Saint Barthélemy rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Malta ranks 147th and Saint Barthélemy ranks 148th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.