Malta vs Saint Helena: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Malta
0.1%
in 2022
Saint Helena
0.1%
in 2022
Malta rank
147th
Saint Helena rank
144th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Malta
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Saint Helena currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Saint Helena's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Saint Helena ahead.
Malta ranks 147th and Saint Helena ranks 144th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Saint Helena in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Saint Helena |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Malta or Saint Helena?
- Saint Helena, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Malta and Saint Helena?
- 0.0%, with Saint Helena ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Helena?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Malta and Saint Helena rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Malta ranks 147th and Saint Helena ranks 144th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.