Martinique vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Martinique
1.5%
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
1.4%
in 2022
Martinique rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Martinique
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Martinique currently reports 1.5% against 1.4% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Martinique's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Martinique has been ahead every year.
Martinique ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 174 countries.
Martinique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Martinique | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.7% | 0.4% | 1.3% | Martinique |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.5% | Martinique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Martinique or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Martinique, at 1.5% against 1.4% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Martinique and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.1%, with Martinique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Martinique and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Martinique ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.