Mauritania vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

Mauritania
1.6%
in 2022
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1.6%
in 2022
Mauritania rank
44th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
45th

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • Mauritania
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1234201820202022

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 1.6% against 1.6% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 44th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 45th of 202 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 4.1% 1.5% 2.6% Mauritania
2020s 1.6% 1.8% 0.2% United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Mauritania or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Mauritania, at 1.6% against 1.6% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Mauritania and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0.0%, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Mauritania and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
Mauritania ranks 44th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 45th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/mauritania/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/mauritania/united-kingdom/">Mauritania vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 1,170 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed